|
Panel Votes to Advance Reparations Bill04/15 06:06
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A House panel advanced a decades-long effort to pay
reparations to the descendants of slaves by approving legislation Wednesday
that would create a commission to study the issue.
It's the first time the House Judiciary Committee has acted on the
legislation. Still, prospects for final passage remain poor in such a closely
divided Congress. The vote to advance the measure to the full House passed
25-17 after a lengthy and often passionate debate that stretched late into the
night.
The legislation would establish a commission to examine slavery and
discrimination in the United States from 1619 to the present. The commission
would then recommend ways to educate Americans about its findings and
appropriate remedies, including how the government would offer a formal apology
and what form of compensation should be awarded.
The bill, commonly referred to as H.R. 40, was first introduced by Rep. John
Conyers, D-Mich., in 1989. The 40 refers to the failed government effort to
provide 40 acres (16 hectares) of land to newly freed slaves as the Civil War
drew to a close.
"This legislation is long overdue," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, the Democratic
chairman of the committee. "H.R. 40 is intended to begin a national
conversation about how to confront the brutal mistreatment of African Americans
during chattel slavery, Jim Crow segregation and the enduring structural racism
that remains endemic to our society today."
The momentum supporters have been able to generate for the bill this
Congress follows the biggest reckoning on racism in a generation in the wake of
George Floyd's death while in police custody.
Still, the House bill has no Republicans among its 176 co-sponsors and would
need 60 votes in the evenly divided Senate, 50-50, to overcome a filibuster.
Republicans on the Judiciary Committee were unanimous in voting against the
measure.
Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the ranking Republican on the committee, said the
commission's makeup would lead to a foregone conclusion in support of
reparations.
"Spend $20 million for a commission that's already decided to take money
from people who were never involved in the evil of slavery and give it to
people who were never subject to the evil of slavery. That's what Democrats on
the Judiciary Committee are doing," Jordan said.
Supporters said the bill is not about a check, but about developing a
structured response to historical and ongoing wrongs.
"I ask my friends on the other side of the aisle, do not ignore the pain,
the history and the reasonableness of this commission," said the bill's
sponsor, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas.
Other Republicans on the committee also spoke against the bill, including
Rep. Burgess Owens, an African American lawmaker from Utah, who said he grew up
in the Deep South where "we believe in commanding respect, not digging or
asking for it." The former professional football player noted that in the
1970s, Black men often weren't allowed to play quarterback or, as he put it,
other "thinking positions."
"Forty years later, we're now electing a president of the United States, a
black man. Vice president of the United States, a black woman. And we say
there's no progress?" Owens said. "Those who say there's no progress are those
who do not want progress."
But Democrats said the country's history is replete with
government-sponsored actions that have discriminated against African Americans
well after slavery ended. Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., noted that the Federal
Housing Administration at one time refused to insure mortgages in Black
neighborhoods while some states prevented Black veterans of World War II from
participating in the benefits of the GI Bill.
"This notion of, like, I wasn't a slave owner. I've got nothing to do with
it misses the point," Cicilline said. "It's about our country's responsibility,
to remedy this wrong and to respond to it in a thoughtful way. And this
commission is our opportunity to do that."
Last month, the Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, became the first U.S.
city to make reparations available to its Black residents for past
discrimination and the lingering effects of slavery. The money will come from
the sale of recreational marijuana and qualifying households would receive
$25,000 for home repairs, down payments on property, and interest or late
penalties on property in the city.
Other communities and organizations considering reparations range from the
state of California to cities like Amherst, Massachusetts; Providence, Rhode
Island; Asheville, North Carolina; and Iowa City, Iowa; religious denominations
like the Episcopal Church; and prominent colleges like Georgetown University in
Washington.
Polling has found long-standing resistance in the U.S. to reparations to
descendants of slaves, divided along racial lines. Only 29% of Americans voiced
support for paying cash reparations, according to an Associated Press-NORC
Center for Public Affairs Research poll taken in the fall of 2019. Most Black
Americans favored reparations, 74%, compared with 15% of white Americans.
President Joe Biden captured the Democratic presidential nomination and
ultimately the White House with the strong support of Black voters. The White
House has said he supports the idea of studying reparations for the descendants
of slaves. But it's unclear how aggressively he would push for passage of the
bill amid other pressing priorities.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus brought up the bill during a
meeting with Biden at the White House on Tuesday.
"We're very comfortable with where President Biden is on H.R. 40," Jackson
Lee told reporters after the meeting.
|
|